EYEG vs CEFZ overlap

EYEG and CEFZ overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

EYEGCEFZ

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

EYEG0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 309

CEFZ0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 47

These funds report on different dates (EYEG: May 31, 2026, CEFZ: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: EYEG, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; CEFZ, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 37 holding any

EYEG5.9% of its 13F dollars, 33.3% of its 6 holders

CEFZ4.1% of its 13F dollars, 6.1% of its 33 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	EYEG	CEFZ
Citadel Advisors LLC	$1.3M	$850K
UBS Group AG	$7K	$47K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: EYEG institutional holders, CEFZ institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do EYEG and CEFZ overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for EYEG as of May 31, 2026 and CEFZ as of July 31, 2026.

Do institutions hold both EYEG and CEFZ?

2 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 37 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.