ETF Holders

CMF vs CGHM overlap

CMF and CGHM overlap 0.6% by weight, across 26 shared holdings.

CMFCGHM

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.6%
overlap by weight, across 26 shared holdings
CMF1.8% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,607
CGHM1.1% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 3,495

Top shared holdings

HoldingCMFCGHMOverlap
California St0.21%0.17%0.17%
Los Angeles-a0.12%0.09%0.09%
San Francisco-REV-C0.08%0.33%0.08%
CA St PUB WKS BRD-a0.05%0.30%0.05%
San Francisco PUB-E0.05%0.04%0.04%
E Co AWP JT PWRS-a-1EAWWTR0.33%0.03%0.03%
Foothill Estrn Transp0.10%0.02%0.02%
CA Regents UNIV-CD0.04%0.02%0.02%
CA Regents UNIV-CD0.11%0.02%0.02%
Los Angeles UNIF-a-10.02%0.01%0.01%
Los Angels WTR & PWR-0.02%0.01%0.01%
Sthrn CA PUB PWR AUTH0.15%0.01%0.01%
Los Angeles DEPT of W0.05%0.01%0.01%
San Francisco CA Bay0.04%0.01%0.01%
Los Angeles WTR PWR-B0.05%0.01%0.01%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: CMF, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; CGHM, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

Who owns them: CMF institutional holders, CGHM institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do CMF and CGHM overlap?

0.6% by weight, with 26 holdings in common, using holdings for CMF as of May 31, 2026 and CGHM as of June 30, 2026. The largest shared position is CALIFORNIA ST.

Do institutions hold both CMF and CGHM?

67 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 480 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.