ETF Holders

CGMS vs BLV overlap

CGMS and BLV overlap 2.2% by weight, across 101 shared holdings.

CGMSBLV

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

2.2%
overlap by weight, across 101 shared holdings
CGMS6.3% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,460
BLV3.5% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 2,983

Top shared holdings

HoldingCGMSBLVOverlap
US Treasury N/BT0.11%0.24%0.11%
Amazon.COM Inc.0.11%0.11%0.11%
Pfizer InvstmntPFE0.12%0.10%0.10%
META PlatformsMETA0.11%0.09%0.09%
Oracle Corp.0.29%0.07%0.07%
META Platforms0.09%0.07%0.07%
META PlatformsMETA0.06%0.08%0.06%
Oracle Corp.0.24%0.06%0.06%
Pacific Gas&ELEC0.12%0.06%0.06%
Bristol-Myers0.14%0.06%0.06%
Boeing Co0.05%0.06%0.05%
Boeing Co/theBA0.09%0.04%0.04%
Oracle Corp.0.06%0.04%0.04%
Space ExploratioSPCX0.07%0.04%0.04%
Charter COMM OPT0.04%0.05%0.04%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: CGMS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; BLV, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

Who owns them: CGMS institutional holders, BLV institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do CGMS and BLV overlap?

2.2% by weight, with 101 holdings in common, using holdings for CGMS as of June 30, 2026 and BLV as of June 30, 2026. The largest shared position is T.

Do institutions hold both CGMS and BLV?

148 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 623 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.